[License-review] Request for Approval of Universal Permissive License (UPL)

[Jim Wright]

Hmmmm.  I don't think it affects a lot of people but the 8.3 file system thing is a fair point and if people feel strongly about it we could rename it to LARGER_W.TXT or something.  

The trick here is that we want people to know what to look for in advance, and if we allow the file name to be changed, it will complicate looking for things (both automated and manual search) and make it more error prone as people and tools may miss the larger works files - I think the best way to address the markdown issue is to have duplicate larger works files in both naming schemes (and have those refer to each other). 

 Regards,
  Jim


On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:11 AM, Kuno Woudt <kuno at frob.nl> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> On 04/14/2014 03:46 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
>>>> (b) any piece of software and/or hardware listed in the LARGER_WORKS.TXT file
>>>> included with the Software (each a �Larger Work� to which the Software is
>>>> contributed by such licensors),
>>> 
>>> I suggest this should be (or allowed to be) LARGER_WORKS.md so that it can look
>>> pretty on github and similar services.
>> 
>> What’s that, .machine-dependent?
> 
> Markdown.
> 
> -- Kuno.
> _______________________________________________
> License-review mailing list
> License-review at opensource.org
> http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-review