[License-review] Request for Approval of Universal Permissive License (UPL)

Josh Berkus josh at postgresql.org
Sat Apr 12 21:33:47 UTC 2014


Jim,

On the whole, I like the idea of having a permissive license with a patent
grant. However, speaking from the developer perspective, I have
questions about how the license is actually expected to work:

> (a) the Software, and (b) any piece of software and/or hardware
> listed in the LARGER_WORKS.TXT file included with the Software (each
> a “Larger Work” to which the Software is contributed by such
> licensors),

- Who writes the LARGER_WORKS.TXT file?
- What if a downstream fork modifies that file?
- Can you give examples of what would go in such a file?
- What if a downstream distributor fails to include the LARGER_WORKS.TXT
file with the software?


Thanks!

--Josh Berkus



More information about the License-review mailing list