[License-review] License Committee Report - 2013-03-06

Bruce Perens bruce at perens.com
Sat Mar 9 00:28:17 UTC 2013

It's going to have that effect, though. At least until someone goes to court about it, and given our difficulty in finding a sucker to be the defendant that could be a long time.

Richard Fontana <fontana at sharpeleven.org> wrote:
>It is true that GPLv3 was drafted to avoid use of the term 'derivative work', but this was not (as you seem to be suggesting) in order to capture calling or providing an API. 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

More information about the License-review mailing list