[License-review] [curiosa] ???Open Source Festival???
rick at linuxmafia.com
Wed Jun 26 15:21:27 UTC 2013
Quoting John Cowan (cowan at mercury.ccil.org):
> Thorsten Glaser scripsit:
> > a bit off-topic, but I was wondering what
> > http://www.open-source-festival.de/en/ (and http://open-the-source.de/
> > the ???official blog???) have to do with Open Source??? maybe OSI
> > needs to go after them and ask them to cease using the name unless
> > there???s some connection?
> The phrase "open source" has several pre-existing meanings. Notably, in
> intelligence work it means a publicly available source of information,
> like a newspaper. Consequently, it is not a protected mark (unlike
> "OSI Certified") and anyone can use it for anything. When people who
> are publishing software are misusing the phrase, we politely ask them
> to stop, then publicly shame them. But this case is not that case.
Moreover, a fundamental aspect of trademark law -- usually completely
unknown to software engineers along with pretty much all of the other
aspects of law they issue opinions about ;-> -- is that a valid trademark
(/service mark, certification mark), under either common law or national
legislation, exists within a specific trade or industry and can coexist
happily with other uses of the same mark in a different trade or
E.g., if I wanted to establish trademark for Moen's Tavern, the faucet
people at Moen Industries would have no basis for objection. (No, I'm
not related. Bastiches wanted a blood test.)
Cheers, "I love stateless systems."
Rick Moen "Don't they have drawbacks?"
rick at linuxmafia.com "Don't what have drawbacks?"
McQ! (4x80) -- Sam Hughes
More information about the License-review