[License-review] License drafting quality and process [was Re: Comment on MOSL and similar licenses]

Luis Villa luis at lu.is
Thu Jun 13 08:27:11 UTC 2013

On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Josh Berkus <josh at postgresql.org> wrote:
> First, let me agree with Rick and point out that the only licenses we've
> approved in the last year were new versions of old approved licenses.

This is not correct. We have approved CeCILL 2.1[1], and we have never
previously approved any version of CeCILL.


[1] Not posted on our website yet, because not posted on their website yet.

More information about the License-review mailing list