[License-review] License drafting quality and process [was Re: Comment on MOSL and similar licenses]
luis at lu.is
Thu Jun 13 08:27:11 UTC 2013
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 10:56 AM, Josh Berkus <josh at postgresql.org> wrote:
> First, let me agree with Rick and point out that the only licenses we've
> approved in the last year were new versions of old approved licenses.
This is not correct. We have approved CeCILL 2.1, and we have never
previously approved any version of CeCILL.
 Not posted on our website yet, because not posted on their website yet.
More information about the License-review