[License-review] License drafting quality and process [was Re: Comment on MOSL and similar licenses]
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Thu Jun 6 14:55:05 UTC 2013
Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz scripsit:
> Requiring evidence of 100+ projects using a new proposed license may indeed
> be beneficial mainly to bodies, i.e. governments discovering (-
> eventually!) the real opportunity of FLOSS distribution.
How will you find 100 people willing to put their projects under a license
that OSI might decide isn't Open Source at all? I certainly wouldn't.
Putting such a demand on license authors is tantamount to shutting down OSI,
at least as far as approving new licenses is concerned.
Anyway, all this strikes me as a solution in search of a problem. We are
really not being inundated with new licenses these days.
While staying with the Asonu, I met a man from John Cowan
the Candensian plane, which is very much like cowan at ccil.org
ours, only more of it consists of Toronto. http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
--Ursula K. Le Guin, Changing Planes
More information about the License-review