[License-review] For Approval: NASA Open Source Agreement 2.0

[Geurts, Bryan A. (GSFC-1401)]

Response with regards to 3.K. is in my earlier post.  Let me know if you don't have it.

Bryan A. Geurts
Chief Patent Counsel
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Code 140.1, 8800 Greenbelt Road
Greenbelt, MD 20771
Phone:  301-286-7352
Fax:  310-286-9502

This document, including any attachments, contains information that is confidential, protected by the attorney-client or other privileges, or constitutes non-public information.  It is intended only for the intended recipients.  If you are not an intended recipient, please take appropriate steps to destroy this document in its entirety and notify the sender of its destruction.  Use, dissemination, distribution or reproduction of this information by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

This communication should only be used for the particular matter discussed herein.  Changes in circumstances and changes in law can greatly alter any current legal advice.


-----Original Message-----
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh at postgresql.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 09, 2013 1:20 PM
To: License submissions for OSI review
Cc: Luis Villa; Geurts, Bryan A. (GSFC-1401)
Subject: Re: [License-review] For Approval: NASA Open Source Agreement 2.0


> Bryan, I'm trying to understand the interaction between 2(A) and 2(B) 
> and was hoping you could answer. Specifically, is the idea that 2(A) 
> covers works covered by 17 USC 105, while 2(B) covers anything not 
> covered by 17 USC 105?
> 
> Anyone else have any concerns/thoughts/etc. about the license?

I haven't seen any answer about 3.K. per my earlier post.

--Josh Berkus