[License-review] Request for Approval of NO NONSENSE OPEN SOURCE LICENSE
Bruce Perens
bruce at perens.com
Fri Jun 8 17:58:43 UTC 2012
Hello Love Nystrom,
A long time ago, while working for the Debian project, I set the rules
that are now called the Open Source Definition. There were a number of
difficult choices. For example, should Open Source licenses allow use of
the software for oppression of people?
One of the examples at the time was the Berkeley SPICE license. This
electrical engineering software included a prohibition, in its license,
on use by the police of South Africa. At the time the license was
written, South Africa was under Apartheid and there was terrible
oppression of the Black population by the police. But Apartheid ended,
and the license continued to include that prohibition for many years
after it was no longer justified.
I took from this example the lesson that you can't micromanage that only
good is done with your license.
Thanks
Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120608/8305e5bc/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120608/8305e5bc/attachment.p7s>
More information about the License-review
mailing list