[License-review] Request for Approval of NO NONSENSE OPEN SOURCE LICENSE

[Love Nystrom]

On 2012-06-09 00.20, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> Love Nystrom dixit:
>> Common logic would have it that open source means you have access to the
>> source,
>> and can make modifications to your liking if you have the capability.
> It means more than that – for example, certain redistribution rights.

Yes, of course, as duly noted in my draft, but why must it imply the right
to not share the profits from selling the work someone else provided ?

Best Regards
// Love