[License-review] CC withdrawl of CC0 from OSI process

[Bruce Perens]

On 02/25/2012 10:56 AM, Lawrence Rosen wrote:
> I don't necessarily agree with Bruce that the CC0 license reflects 
> such a bad motive.
I am not condemning CC or the researchers who asked for the language. 
They are just dealing with the reality of the context in which they find 
themselves.

But we should condemn the creation of that unfortunate context, of which 
the Bayh-Dole act is the most easily identifiable problem.

     Thanks

     Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120225/804c2b80/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120225/804c2b80/attachment.p7s>