[License-review] CC withdrawl of CC0 from OSI process

[Bruce Perens]

We should note that CC's explanation of the reason for patent language 
in CC0 was that the entities dedicating the content /did/ have patents 
related to that same content, and wanted to monetize them. Or they would 
not have asked for the language. IMO this refutes the argument that they 
are the parties least likely to bring suit.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120225/2b818323/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120225/2b818323/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120225/2b818323/attachment.p7s>