[License-review] Section 203(a) copyright recapture

[Bruce Perens]

On 02/17/2012 09:18 PM, John Cowan wrote:
> I note that MIT has said that the MIT license is not an implicit 
> patent license.
It's in their interest to say so, but this seems to me to be an attempt 
to lock a barn door long after the horse is gone. Seeing them prove 
absence of estoppel in court would be more interesting.

     Thanks

     Bruce
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: bruce.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120217/c16d58c2/attachment.vcf>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4447 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20120217/c16d58c2/attachment.p7s>