For Approval: The netX Public Lisense (in plain text)
cowan at mercury.ccil.org
Thu Oct 7 16:42:50 UTC 2010
Wilson, Andrew scripsit:
> Let's try a thought experiment. I want to copy some BSD code into
> my netX-licensed project. The combined work presumably must be
> netX-licensed since it is the more restrictive license. However, all
> existing BSD disclaimers of liability must remain in place, and those
> disclaimers (while they might not be enforceable in all jurisdictions)
> are broader than netX's. Conflict of licenses?
I don't see how. Each licensor is disclaiming liability for his own code.
The fact that there is BSD-licensed code in the Windows TCP/IP stack
doesn't mean that the BSD disclaimer controls Windows.
John Cowan cowan at ccil.org http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Historians aren't constantly confronted with people who carry on
self-confidently about the rule against adultery in the sixth amendment to
the Declamation of Independence, as written by Benjamin Hamilton. Computer
scientists aren't always having to correct people who make bold assertions
about the value of Objectivist Programming, as examplified in the HCNL
entities stored in Relaxational Databases. --Mark Liberman
More information about the License-review