WebM license third-party submission

[Russ Nelson]

Lawrence Rosen writes:
 > Russ Nelson suggested:
 > > Same thing for Larry's
 > > meetings with his clients.  Web streaming, we want web streaming.
 > 
 > OK, Russ, I'm happy to let you into my meetings that concern you, as long as
 > you let me into your meetings that concern me.

That's a false symmetry, like girls looking for husbands and husbands
looking for girls.

 > By the way, watch what you ask for. Web streams of my meetings with clients
 > would be very boring.

So are OSI bored meetings.  Y'know, the last time somebody asked if
they could sit in on a board meeting because we were discussing
something material to their concerns, they asked and we said "yes".
That was, um, about 9 years ago.

 > In any event, this isn't the important issue that Chris raised. I'm
 > confident now that discussions about the WebM license--when and if it is
 > submitted by Google--will be public.

Already are ... already are, and no reason to change that.

-- 
--my blog is at    http://blog.russnelson.com
Crynwr supports open source software
521 Pleasant Valley Rd. | +1 315-600-8815
Potsdam, NY 13676-3213  |     Sheepdog