License Committee Report for December 2009
Dave Page
dpage at pgadmin.org
Wed Jan 20 16:01:38 UTC 2010
Any progress on this yet?
Regards, Dave.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2009 at 3:56 AM, Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
> Okay, I'll pass that on to the board. Oh, wait, you just did. Well,
> anyway, now we know that you considered it, tried it, and it didn't
> work.
>
> Dave Page writes:
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
> > > Dave Page writes:
> > > > Where can I find out the result of this submission?
> > >
> > > Hi, Dave, sorry for not getting back to you. I was away in India
> > > during this board meeting, and didn't convey the board's decision to
> > > you. The board wishes to know if you have considered relicensing
> > > under the MIT License? If you construe your work as a collective
> > > copyright of all contributors, then any copyright holder is free to
> > > license under any terms as long as they compensate all other copyright
> > > holders. In the open source world, relicensing from your license to
> > > the MIT license is a change of no effect, so no compensation would be
> > > due.
> >
> > Hi Russ,
> >
> > As I understand it (based on advice from SFLC about a year ago in
> > relation to a different project), we wouldn't be able to claim
> > collective copyright as we inherited the original code and licence
> > from UC Berkeley. It was only appropriate for the other project
> > because from day one, all code was attributed to the defined group
> > that made up the project team - and even then, we were advised to get
> > explicit permission to relicence from all contributors and to avoid
> > relying on collective copyright. A large part of the reason for that
> > was that we had a German developer who disagreed with the change, and
> > German law does not allow individual contributors to relicence.
> >
> > Regardless of that however, the project's core team has previously
> > discussed and rejected any change of licence.
> >
> > --
> > Dave Page
> > PostgreSQL Core Team
More information about the License-review
mailing list