MPL use of the term "condition" to masquerade "Responsibilities"

Romain Berrendonner romain at
Thu Dec 2 14:06:00 UTC 2010

Le 02/12/2010 14:51, Alexander Terekhov a écrit :
> On the other hand, the MPL's "Responsibilities" just can't be
> fulfilled without license grant being in effect and hence just can't
> be conditions under US Restatement of Contracts 2d, Section 224.

Isn't it just that these conditions are actually condition subsequent 
rather than condition precedent ?


More information about the License-review mailing list