For Approval By: S-GPL

[Matthew Flaschen]

Bruce Perens wrote:
> John Cowan wrote:
>> Doesn't work here:
>>   
> I agree.
>> Non-profit or contributor:  GPL
>>   
> Isn't it:
> 
> Non-profit: GPL
> "Enterprise" Contributor: Apache
> "Enterprise" Contributor with signature: something else, not stated.

Since the "something" doesn't apply "without the need for execution of
an additional license" it's not compliant, even if the other problems
were fixed.

Matt Flaschen