Revised License Committee Report for March 2009
wtfpl user
wtfpl.user at googlemail.com
Thu Mar 19 15:07:16 UTC 2009
2009/3/19 Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com>:
> This license does nothing to protect the licensor, and gives the
> licensees all permissions. It *is* the public domain, is not a
> license, and is not needed by anybody whose purpose is anything other
> than to annoy others, waste their time, and create a public bad.
Wow. You should submit a patch to
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WTFPL
>
> This license has gone before the board and has been rejected. Further
> discussion here is off-topic. I expect self-discipline, but it it's
> lacking, I will take steps.
Do I get lashed with a wet noodle?
More information about the License-review
mailing list