[Fwd: Re: For Approval: The Azure License]
Joel Sherrill
joel.sherrill at oarcorp.com
Wed Jul 8 19:54:03 UTC 2009
Hi,
An earlier comment that Microsoft Azure was
unknown bothered me. But not enough to
reply immediately. :)
Microsoft Azure isn't an obscure research
project. You should reconsider using another
name. Azure is Microsoft's cloud computing
offering if I read the marketing speak correctly.
http://www.microsoft.com/azure/default.mspx
--joel
Wilson, Andrew wrote:
> Kenneth Ballenegger [mailto:seoxys at gmail.com] wrote:
>
>
>> Wilson: Good point about big OSS projects having many copyright
>> holders. I could add a clause that states that in case there are
>> multiple copyright holders, attribution should be given to the group
>> as a whole (eg. Contains code from the Linux project [link]) -- do you
>> think that would work?
>>
>
> Yes, that would work. Require a single link either to the Initial Developer's page,
> or to the main project page, where the list of contributors can be as long as you
> like. Avoid NASCAR-ization of projects who use your code.
>
> Andy Wilson
> Intel open source technology center
>
--
Joel Sherrill, Ph.D. Director of Research & Development
joel.sherrill at OARcorp.com On-Line Applications Research
Ask me about RTEMS: a free RTOS Huntsville AL 35805
Support Available (256) 722-9985
More information about the License-review
mailing list