For Approval: The Azure License

Dag-Erling Smørgrav des at des.no
Wed Jul 8 09:19:46 UTC 2009


Kenneth Ballenegger <seoxys at gmail.com> writes:
> I have previously been using either the BSD or MIT license, sometimes
> not even bothering with a license at all. But they do not satisfy me
> fully:
>
> I need a short human-readable license which would be similar to the
> MIT, with a major differences:
>
> It would require attribution in an appropriate place to be read by
> interested users of any derivative work (typically a closed-source
> app), such as the documentation, credits document or about box. (For
> example, a “Contains code by Kenneth Ballenegger” or “Special thanks
> to Kenneth Ballenegger” in the about box is what I'm looking for.)
>
> It also includes a no-endorsment clause similar to BSD's.

The so-called New BSD License (three-clause) already gives you that:
anyone redistributing it in binary form is required to include the
copyright statement, license conditions and disclaimer.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des at des.no



More information about the License-review mailing list