[Fwd: Re: For Approval: The Azure License]
Bruce Perens
bruce at perens.com
Wed Jul 8 03:03:33 UTC 2009
Luis Villa wrote:
> It seems like it'd be terrific to require a statement of motive for
> the license (and perhaps description of the community the license is
> intended to serve?) as part of the license-review discussion.
He wants a permissive license that is simple to read and has an
attribution requirement.
It's pretty boring, maybe not worth making the license propagation
problem worse. There's no such license already approved?
Thanks
Bruce
More information about the License-review
mailing list