For Approval: IPA Font License v1.0
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Wed Feb 25 12:43:15 UTC 2009
yuko.noguchi at mhmjapan.com wrote:
> According to IPA, it is true that some of the GPL font licenses attach
> native files.
I didn't say anything about the GPL.
> Most of these native files are created by a Microsoft's font developing
> tool called "VOLT."
Nor is any of this specific to VOLT.
> Native files created by VOLT can only be used when you want to modify
> the font program
> using VOLT, and do not have any interoperability with other developing
Again, how is this relevant? It would be great if native files were
inter-operable, but that's a separate issue from their being part of the
> Moreover, some of the developing tools for font programs, such as OSS
> developing tool
> "fontforge" or developing tools provided by IPA, do not need any native
> files to open
> and modify the font programs, and also do not create any native files
> for others to reference.
Then in those cases native files are not part of the source. But in
other cases they are.
> If we ask that all the recipients should always provide native files
> along with the font program,
> we believe there would be recipients who would have difficulties
> complying the license.
How so? I think the diff-related requirements are far more difficult.
> Or, to put it differently, IPA is reluctant to mandate the distribution
> of native files because
> it may create some effects to limit the available developing tools the
> recipient can use, which
> IPA believes is contradictory to openness.
That's not true. If I get a copy of the complete C source code of the
Linux kernel, I'm still free to compile it then edit it in a hex editor.
I don't have to use all the parts of the source. Similarly, even
though I received native files, I don't have to use them.
> Therefore, IPA understands that the role of native file is largely
> different from the source code
> in the context of usual software program. Of course, the IPA license
> does not in any way
> prohibit the attachment of the native files. If there is one, it is of
> course desirable to share it:
> however, mandating to do so is not suitable for font files.
This can be solved by requiring full source be distributed in response
to a written request.
More information about the License-review