What would work instead of the MXM public license?
bruce at perens.com
Tue Apr 14 20:58:13 UTC 2009
Bruce Perens wrote:
> I suggest it as an example of how far a license can go to spoil the
> potential revenue stream for a non-commercially-licensed derivative of
> a program, by mandating that a version that can be distributed at zero
> cost be made available.
You can also require that the creators of derivative works make a
similar patent grant to yours. Which would make the Open Source folks
happy while giving the commercial folks even more reason to commercially
Hm. I guess nobody has worked out the maximally-restrictive Open Source
license. Oops, I've created a monster.
More information about the License-review