For approval: MXM Public license
luis.villa at gmail.com
Fri Apr 10 19:26:12 UTC 2009
On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Russ Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com> wrote:
> John Cowan writes:
> > Russ Nelson scripsit:
> > > If anybody thought that the BSD *didn't* come with an implicit patent
> > > license, then somebody would have at least *asserted* "You have no
> > > patent license". And yet nobody has.
> > It was, indeed. Less than five minutes of googling.
> Hrm. I didn't mean that someone was bloviating about the BSD.
> There's been plenty of that. I meant that I've never heard of anybody
> who said "Here is this patent-encumbered code licensed under the BSD
> license for which I am not granting you a license".
More information about the License-review