For approval: MXM Public license

Luis Villa luis.villa at
Fri Apr 10 19:26:12 UTC 2009

On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Russ Nelson <nelson at> wrote:
> John Cowan writes:
>  > Russ Nelson scripsit:
>  >
>  > > If anybody thought that the BSD *didn't* come with an implicit patent
>  > > license, then somebody would have at least *asserted* "You have no
>  > > patent license".  And yet nobody has.
>  >
>  > It was, indeed.  Less than five minutes of googling.
> Hrm.  I didn't mean that someone was bloviating about the BSD.
> There's been plenty of that.  I meant that I've never heard of anybody
> who said "Here is this patent-encumbered code licensed under the BSD
> license for which I am not granting you a license".

s/am not/cannot/


More information about the License-review mailing list