[UOML] License for approval

[Matthew Flaschen]

Brian Behlendorf wrote:
>> Trademark is not a good choice for our case. UOML is a new standard, 
>> has not
>> been recognized by end user. Not use UOML trademark is not a big loss.
>> Trademark can't prevent verdor to develope their own software based on 
>> open
>> source contribution, not conform with UOML standard while don't use UOML
>> trademark.

You shouldn't be able to prevent that.  If your license does,  it 
violates OSD #6, OSD #8, and OSD #10

Matt Flaschen