License for approval

Brian Behlendorf brian at
Fri Mar 28 04:33:08 UTC 2008

On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Now, what you *can* do is say this:
>    If the OASIS committee has determined that your modified software
>    complies with the UOML standard, then you are free to distribute
>    your software under $ACADEMIC license terms.  If we decide you
>    haven't, then you have to distribute your software under the
>    $RECIPROCAL license terms.

Isn't that what the SISSL tried to do?


More information about the License-review mailing list