License for approval
brian at hyperreal.org
Fri Mar 28 04:33:08 UTC 2008
On Thu, 27 Mar 2008, Russ Nelson wrote:
> Now, what you *can* do is say this:
> If the OASIS committee has determined that your modified software
> complies with the UOML standard, then you are free to distribute
> your software under $ACADEMIC license terms. If we decide you
> haven't, then you have to distribute your software under the
> $RECIPROCAL license terms.
Isn't that what the SISSL tried to do?
More information about the License-review