Request for approval: EUPL (European Union Public Licence)
bruce at perens.com
Mon Mar 17 18:13:27 UTC 2008
I am not representing OSI, just myself. I recommend that your
organization should withdraw its current request, pursue some
modification of this license with IDABC, and resubmit it when that is done.
1. Obviously the license update language in #13. I am concened that
updates not only refrain from removing rights, but also from adding
/additional requirements./ There should be clear language to that effect.
2. I think that removing the words "and address" from #11 is advisable,
since the law doesn't necessarily require an address. This would not
change the intended effect of the statement and would remove ambiguity.
3. Since OSI has approved licenses with choice of law, I can't say it's
reason for rejection of the license, but I still want to register my own
More information about the License-review