Question and review (Was: Re: Request - University Jaume I License.)
Paul Santapau
santapau at sg.uji.es
Wed Jun 4 07:20:20 UTC 2008
El Tuesday 03 June 2008 19:25:18 escribió:
> Paul Santapau writes:
> > That license we use for Open Source asks the modifier or
> > redistributer of the code for an e-mail notification, the
> > motivation of this notification is to keep the track on the
> > software in order to recontribute to the comunity and the open
> > knowledge.
>
> What if you never receive the email, because, say, I have redirected
> all email to uji.es into the bit-bucket? I've sent you the email, but
> I'm not responsible for you receiving it.
>
As Bruce explains regarding Apple's license, our demand will be a kind of,
because in a legal procedure the one who supposedly violated the license
would have to demonstrate, he sent an e-mail, that will be enough despite
of the fact the mail arrived or not.
> This is not a good idea. Much better to include in the README a
> request to send back modifications for incorporation into the code
> base.
But by this way the attempt of the notification will not be "by license" and,
in my opinion, people will by-pass it. don't you think so?
Regards.
Paúl.
More information about the License-review
mailing list