Deprecate (strongly) Re: REMOVE (entirely) the Artistic License 1.0?
ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com
Thu Jul 10 21:20:05 UTC 2008
On Jul 10, 2008, at 1:14 PM, Matthew Flaschen wrote:
> Ernest Prabhakar wrote:
>> Given the special circumstances of Artistic 1.0, I propose
>> extending it to say:
>>> (NOTE: This license has been superseded by the Artistic License,
>>> Version 2.0. Given the legal issues around Version 1.0, we
>>> strongly encourage all developers to move their affected code to
>>> Version 2.0 as soon as possible)
>> Does that sound reasonable?
> Yes. It /may/ be appropriate to explain in more detail what these
> legal issues entail. However, I don't feel that's necessary at this
> Matt Flaschen
Okay, I've gone ahead and made that change:
As noted elsewhere, this is actually preferable to removing 1.0
entirely, since it provides a clear statement of what happened and
why. So, I consider this matter resolved.
Thanks for everyone's input.
-- Ernie P.
More information about the License-review