Legacy? Re: For Approval: The MirOS Licence
ernest.prabhakar at gmail.com
Wed Jul 9 13:50:49 UTC 2008
On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:49 PM, Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> I wonder why the ISC licence, my other submission in 2006, was
> now (in 2008) accepted, then? It doesn't even have this feature
> (OKD conformance) _and_ has questionable language ("without fee"
> vs "with or without fee", and "and" vs "and/or").
If memory serves, we approved the ISC license as a "legacy", because
there was a large body of existing code widely used by the community.
It sounds like MirOS is a *new* license, only used in code copyrighted
by you, so the "legacy" issue doesn't apply.
Is that correct, or am I missing something?
-- Ernie P.
More information about the License-review