For (Legacy?) Approval: The MirOS Licence

Matthew Flaschen matthew.flaschen at
Tue Jul 8 21:38:41 UTC 2008

Thorsten Glaser wrote:

>   ‣ use the term “work” instead of “software”
>     … which has the interesting side-effect that the MirOS Licence also
>       conforms to the Open Knowledge Definition (at least I think)

This is the only advantage I see over the MIT license, and in my opinion 
it's not nearly significant enough to justify approval.

> • allow for advertising clauses in a standardised manner

I don't see where the submission allows for advertising clauses.

Matt Flaschen

More information about the License-review mailing list