For (Legacy?) Approval: The MirOS Licence
matthew.flaschen at gatech.edu
Tue Jul 8 21:38:41 UTC 2008
Thorsten Glaser wrote:
> ‣ use the term “work” instead of “software”
> … which has the interesting side-effect that the MirOS Licence also
> conforms to the Open Knowledge Definition (at least I think)
This is the only advantage I see over the MIT license, and in my opinion
it's not nearly significant enough to justify approval.
> • allow for advertising clauses in a standardised manner
I don't see where the submission allows for advertising clauses.
More information about the License-review