For Approval: Transitive Grace Period Public Licence, v1.0
zooko
zooko at zooko.com
Sat Dec 20 15:13:27 UTC 2008
Dear license-review:
Thank you, Bruce Perens, for your example of how a grace period
clause could be written as an appendix to the OSLv3. I like your
idea of re-using licensing text by reference instead of by copy-and-
modify.
However, as I currently understand it, the text you suggested would
not have the same effect as the TGPPLv1 has. Larry Rosen's post of
December 14 indicates that an "added burden" would requires a new
licence and not just a waiver appended to OSLv3. This is consistent
with what I've learned from Prof. Moglen as well as from my own
analysis. The requirement to transitively offer the grace period to
users of your derived work is an added burden.
In any case, even if a licence with the same properties as the
TGPPLv1 could be constructed as combination of an existing licence
and added text, it would still need to have a separate name so that
people could refer to it succinctly and unambiguously, and so that
they could check whether bodies such as OSI have approved the
resulting combined text as being open source or not. For code that
I've distributed and plan to distribute in the future, that name is
"Transitive Grace Period Public Licence", although the version number
could change, and I'm not opposed to future versions of TGPPL being
constructed by reference instead of by copy-and-modify, if the result
would have desirable properties.
Regards,
Zooko
---
Tahoe, the Least-Authority Filesystem -- http://allmydata.org
backup all your files for $10/month -- http://allmydata.com/?
tracking=zsig
More information about the License-review
mailing list