<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
On 4/6/2026 8:29 AM, Richard Fontana via License-discuss wrote:<br>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAC1cPGz6kX6qx9sv_jEdpHpGZH4AWS2Vc6utgueMvKp14AX1tw@mail.gmail.com">
<pre>My general view is that traditional open source software licenses are
completely appropriate for association with such material if they are
copyrightable (and I'm starting to come around to the view, which I'd
previously been resisting for a complex set of reasons, that they are
appropriate even in situations where copyrightability is relatively
dubious).</pre>
</blockquote>
Can you elaborate?<br>
<br>
Pam<br>
<br>
<br>
Pamela S. Chestek<br>
Chestek Legal<br>
4641 Post St.<br>
Unit 4316<br>
El Dorado Hills, CA 95762<br>
+1 919-800-8033<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
</body>
</html>