<div dir="auto"><div>Agreed. But I couldn't actually find the text that implemented that requirement.</div><div><br></div><div data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Bruce Perens K6BP</div></div></div></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Tue, Oct 28, 2025, 16:11 Josh Berkus <<a href="mailto:josh@berkus.org">josh@berkus.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">Morten,<br>
<br>
> I am representing Teradyne Robotics A/S, a division of Teradyne inc. <br>
> (<a href="https://www.teradyne.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.teradyne.com/</a> <<a href="https://www.teradyne.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.teradyne.com/</a>>), that provides <br>
> robot arms (<a href="https://www.universal-robots.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.universal-robots.com/</a> <<a href="https://www.universal-" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://www.universal-</a> <br>
> <a href="http://robots.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">robots.com/</a>>) and autonomous mobile robots (<a href="https://mobile-industrial-" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mobile-industrial-</a> <br>
> <a href="http://robots.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">robots.com/</a> <<a href="https://mobile-industrial-robots.com/" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mobile-industrial-robots.com/</a>>).<br>
<br>
While I haven't reviewed the text of the license, there seems to be a <br>
core purpose of the license that's at odds with open source requirements:<br>
<br>
> The main goal was to find a license that would allow third parties to <br>
use these models in simulation environments while not allowing them to <br>
manufacture physical products based on them.<br>
<br>
That's a clear violation of OSD6 ("no discrimination against fields of <br>
endeavor"), as far as I can tell, and explains why you couldn't find an <br>
existing open source license that suited your purpose. This is very <br>
similar to "no commercial use" licenses that are popular with a variety <br>
of entities; those can be open-ish, but they are not open source.<br>
<br>
It sounds like what you want is more of a "shared source" license, or <br>
even an agreement, for your association.<br>
<br>
-- <br>
Josh Berkus<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an <a href="http://opensource.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">opensource.org</a> email address.<br>
<br>
License-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-discuss@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer">License-discuss@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org" rel="noreferrer noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div>