<div dir="ltr">> <span style="color:rgb(29,29,29);font-family:Poppins,sans-serif;font-size:18px">The license does not have terms that structurally put the licensor in a more favored position than any licensee.</span><div><span style="color:rgb(29,29,29);font-family:Poppins,sans-serif;font-size:18px"><br></span></div><div><span style="color:rgb(29,29,29);font-family:Poppins,sans-serif;font-size:18px">Please use "must". Does is like "shall". This is one of a zillion references on why not to use "shall": </span><a href="https://www.isba.org/barnews/2009/11/25/must-vs-shall">https://www.isba.org/barnews/2009/11/25/must-vs-shall</a></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 6:12 PM Pamela Chestek <<a href="mailto:pamela.chestek@opensource.org">pamela.chestek@opensource.org</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hi all,<br>
<br>
The OSI has now posted the recommendations of the License Review Working <br>
Group. The blog post is at <br>
<a href="https://blog.opensource.org/the-license-review-working-group-asks-for-community-input-on-its-recommendations/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://blog.opensource.org/the-license-review-working-group-asks-for-community-input-on-its-recommendations/</a>, <br>
with a wiki version available for comments. <br>
<a href="https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Working%20Groups%20%26%20Incubator%20Projects/License%20Review/#" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Working%20Groups%20%26%20Incubator%20Projects/License%20Review/#</a><br>
<br>
Comments will be open on the wiki for four months to allow adequate <br>
time. The OSI will also have a session in the Legal and Policy Issues <br>
Dev Room at FOSDEM, <a href="https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/license_review/" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://fosdem.org/2023/schedule/event/license_review/</a><br>
<br>
Looking forward to all of your comments and insight.<br>
<br>
Pamela Chestek<br>
Chair, License Committee<br>
Open Source Initiative<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an <a href="http://opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">opensource.org</a> email address.<br>
<br>
License-discuss mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:License-discuss@lists.opensource.org" target="_blank">License-discuss@lists.opensource.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div>Bruce Perens K6BP</div></div></div></div>