<html>
  <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
  </head>
  <body>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 5/15/2020 11:13 AM, Tobie Langel
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAKgxSaDRQ5i_jMtE9m9UQXHkWZUXzbos-kQL=BaN61_QJuLbCg@mail.gmail.com">
      <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
      <div dir="ltr">
        <div class="gmail_quote">
          <div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:55
            PM Richard Fontana <<a href="mailto:rfontana@redhat.com"
              moz-do-not-send="true">rfontana@redhat.com</a>> wrote:<br>
          </div>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
            0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
            rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">On Fri, May 15, 2020 at
            10:28 AM Tobie Langel <<a
              href="mailto:tobie@unlockopen.com" target="_blank"
              moz-do-not-send="true">tobie@unlockopen.com</a>> wrote:<br>
            > The license review process[1] states that you need to
            have "appropriate standing" to submit a license review
            request.<br>
            ><br>
            > What does that term mean and where is it defined?<br>
            ><br>
            > Could we either define it on the same page or remove
            this requirement altogether?<br>
            <br>
            It's not obvious but I think it refers to the "by" line in
            the<br>
            description of the submission types.<br>
            <br>
            In the normal "For Approval" case, it's the license steward
            who has<br>
            appropriate standing.<br>
            <br>
            In the "Retirement" case, it's "license steward (only)",
            which hints<br>
            that there might be cases where a non-steward could do an
            approval<br>
            submission for the "approval" case (as has happened a few
            times).<br>
            <br>
            In the "Legacy Approval" case, it's the license steward or
            "interested<br>
            licensee".<br>
          </blockquote>
          <div><br>
            Thank you, Richard.</div>
          <div><br>
          </div>
          <div>I don't think there's an easy way to suggest wording
            changes to the website without pestering┬áPatrick, is there?</div>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
    If you write it I can make the changes to the page.<br>
    <br>
    Pam<br>
    <br>
    Pamela Chestek<br>
    Chair, License Review Committee<br>
    Open Source Initiative<br>
  </body>
</html>