<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 7/7/19 1:11 PM, Chris DiBona wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CAEq5uwm2DTFeciBNofqSHY-nOmeC4CjHAShRsYSGBBsWcckHPw@mail.gmail.com">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<div bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<blockquote type="cite">
<div>If I remember correctly, Oracle did find early on one
function implementation that had indeed been copy pasted
from OpenJDK to Android. But this was so minor (and
obvious) it is not part of the issues decided in higher
courts.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
</blockquote>
Yes, there was minor copying but it's dropped out of the case.<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Specifically, there wasn't. We had released a new , improved
version of a sorting algorithim to teh jcp and to harmony, they
then claimed that the code was copied from java to android, when
if came from Josh Bloch at google in the first place. </div>
</blockquote>
Interesting, thanks for the clarification.<br>
<br>
Pam<br>
<br>
Pamela S. Chestek<br>
Chestek Legal<br>
PO Box 2492<br>
Raleigh, NC 27602<br>
+1 919-800-8033<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
</body>
</html>