<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAFPTOkVS8G1h71JH6GPm6rAJzv_V0b1vf5Gzc2KxyeXodNbP7Q@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<div dir="ltr">
<div class="gmail_extra">
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px
0.8ex;border-left:1px solid
rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
If the license steward doesn't have a dedicated license
page (other than the text), like EPL, the closest to a
license homepage would be the legal page I assume...[1]
However, it only has other Eclipse information and not
about the license. I'm not sure it helps.<br>
I provisionally set EPL FAQ as homepage. I must
misunderstand the intention of the homepage placeholder,
in my attempt to take MPL's as example. MPL has a rich
home. :)<br>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>No, I think in the EPL case, the FAQ is the right thing
to link to. I think the key thing is to have the "most
informative page about the license that is not the license
itself"; whether that is a homepage or a FAQ doesn't
matter that much; if it is both, no harm there either.</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I agree that the EPL FAQ page is the best available alternative for
the license.<br>
<br>
Oddly enough, it has never occurred to us to have a page dedicated
to the license. I'm going to add that to the "to do" list.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>