<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 8/17/2013 9:38 PM, Richard Fontana
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:20130818013803.GB15612@sharpeleven.org"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Speaking just for myself, it is difficult for me to imagine any
license chooser or license explanation site that I wouldn't think was
more problematic than useful. Linking to a <b class="moz-txt-star"><span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span>wide<span class="moz-txt-tag">*</span></b> variety of license
choosers or summary sites with a very strong caveat emptor statement
might be okay.</pre>
</blockquote>
Because you are so intimately familiar with the licenses and know
every feature and blemish, so you seek the perfect when maybe we
should only aspire to the better-than-nothing. Maybe not; I read
your slides and take your point that "nothing" isn't really all that
scary. But I'm having a little difficulty reconciling the concepts
that a narrower choice of tested licenses is better (i.e., license
proliferation is bad) but we're not going to help you understand how
these licenses work so you can make a better-informed, albeit
perhaps not perfect, choice.<br>
<br>
Pam<br>
<br>
Pamela S. Chestek, Esq.<br>
Chestek Legal<br>
PO Box 2492<br>
Raleigh, NC 27602<br>
919-800-8033<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:pamela@chesteklegal.com">pamela@chesteklegal.com</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.chesteklegal.com">www.chesteklegal.com</a><br>
</body>
</html>