<html><head><style type="text/css"><!-- DIV {margin:0px;} --></style></head><body><div style="font-family:times new roman, new york, times, serif;font-size:12pt"><DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">Hi, so what you are saying is that unless its totally unique then it cannot be classified as "intellectual property".. there are other similar configs out there (I am not the one claiming IP.. just checking how it works with Opensourced products). Basically the way I see it is that if all you have done is put together some open source software into a "special configuration" then there must be a hundred other people out there that have done the same thing.</DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"> </DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">thanks<BR><BR><BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif">----- Original Message ----<BR>From: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org><BR>To: joe digital <nkj690@yahoo.com><BR>Cc: license-discuss@opensource.org<BR>Sent: Saturday, March 22, 2008 12:58:44 PM<BR>Subject: Re: GPL2 and IBM Public license<BR><BR>joe digital scripsit:<BR><BR>> If I understand correctly you cannot claim intellectual property<BR>> over this software,<BR><BR>Of course not. You are not the owner, nor did the owner give you<BR>those rights.<BR><BR>> but lets say you have configured a combination of this software in a<BR>> special way or even have added a patch to the software can you then<BR>> claim intellectual property over the way its configured?<BR><BR>In principle, yes, though a court might decide that your efforts are<BR>not creative enough. In addition, if you did the work as part of your<BR>regular job, it may belong to
your employer, not you. I am not a lawyer;<BR>this is not legal advice.<BR><BR>> I would guess the answer is NO since it is publicly available<BR>> softwareand unless you patent the patches or configuration it is<BR>> public domain?<BR><BR>"Public domain" means that there is no copyright owner. None of the works<BR>you originally mentioned are in the public domain: their owners share<BR>them with you under generous licenses, asking for no money in return,<BR>but imposing certain restrictions on how you distribute them and what<BR>kinds of derivative works you make.<BR><BR>Patents are another ball of wax. They don't transfer from one country<BR>to another, they require a much higher standard of originality than<BR>copyrights, and they cost a mint to obtain (US$50,000 minimum).<BR><BR>-- <BR>Yes, chili in the eye is bad, but so is your John Cowan<BR>ear. However, I would suggest you wash your <A
href="mailto:cowan@ccil.org" ymailto="mailto:cowan@ccil.org">cowan@ccil.org</A><BR>hands thoroughly before going to the toilet. <A href="http://www.ccil.org/~cowan" target=_blank>http://www.ccil.org/~cowan</A><BR> --gadicath<BR></DIV>
<DIV style="FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: times new roman, new york, times, serif"><BR></DIV></div><br>
<hr size=1>Looking for last minute shopping deals? <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping">
Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.</a></body></html>