<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Nov 30, 2007 5:50 PM, Philippe Verdy <<a href="mailto:verdy_p@wanadoo.fr">verdy_p@wanadoo.fr</a>> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">










<div link="blue" vlink="blue" lang="FR">

<div>

<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;" lang="EN-GB">Requiring copies to be
verbatim is against what the GPL protects: allowing modifications.</span></font></p>

<p><font color="navy" face="Arial" size="2"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial; color: navy;" lang="EN-GB"></span></font></p></div></div></blockquote><div><br>No, I didn't say that.<br><br>I said that you can't change the license on work you don't own anyway.  Merely including it verbatim doesn't even raise that question.
<br><br>And I didn't read Diane's license as forbidding *modifications* to be licensed under the GPL.  It just said "this code" which I read to be the original verbatim contribution.<br><br>Best Wishes,<br>
Chris Travers<br></div></div><br>