<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 9/10/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Brendan Scott</b> <<a href="mailto:lists@opensourcelaw.biz">lists@opensourcelaw.biz</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br><br>Could an alternative list be set up?</blockquote><div><br>Agreed. <br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">Another list I'm on has a parallel list (called un-) to which threads are moved (by a moderator) when they become off topic.
<br><br>Alternatively, a new list could be set up called license-approve...</blockquote><div><br><br>+1 <br><br>Clear names and public guidelines avoid a great many problems. Most people probably would assume that a list named "license-discuss" was there for discussing licenses (as its name implies) and of which approval discussions were only a small part of the scope.
<br><br>Unless a list has public and prominant guidelines there *are* no real (official or otherwise) guidelines. If this is a problem it should be fixed.<br><br>Best Wishes,<br>Chris Travers<br></div><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Brendan<br><br><br><br><br><br></blockquote></div><br>