<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/23/07, <b class="gmail_sendername">Matthew Flaschen</b> <<a href="mailto:matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu">matthew.flaschen@gatech.edu</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
Lawrence Rosen wrote:<br>> Rick Moen wrote:<br>>> As Matt points out, you have fundamentally misunderstood the notion of<br>>> compilation copyright, and apparently confused it with that of<br>>> collective works.
<br>><br>> Huh? The definitions of "collective work" [1] and "compilation" [2], while<br>> different in 17 U.S.C 101, are pretty similar.<br><br>But neither covers the actual code in the compilation/collective, right?
<br><br>Matt Flaschen<br></blockquote></div><br>But wouldn't the MS-PL on the compilation be only allowed if it extended to every item in the compilation?<br><br>Best Wishes,<br>Chris Travers<br>