<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META content="MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=GENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=#ffffff><FONT face=Arial size=2>
<DIV>>> Fernando Velloso wrote:<BR>>> <BR>>> After reviewing
The Open Source Milestone Application >>Framework License,<BR>>>
Version 1.5, I coclude that it's incompatible with the >>GNU
GPL.<BR>>> The clauses 3 and 6 make this incompatibility.<BR></DIV>
<DIV>Bjorn Reese wrote:</DIV>
<DIV>>That may very well be the case, but GPL compliancy is not >a
concern<BR>>of the Open Source Definition.<BR></DIV>
<DIV>True, but it's part of the process of getting a license approved. </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>"3.Explain how software distributed under your license can be used in
conjunction with software distributed under other open source licenses. Which
license do you think will take precedence for derivative or combined works? Is
there any software license that is entirely incompatible with your proposed
license?."</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV>Akil Franklin (who sent the license) wrote:</DIV>
<DIV>>To our knowledge there are no software licenses that are >entirely
incompatible with our proposed license.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>I just wanted that they know that it's incompatible with the GPL, in my
opinion. It' incompatible because it has the same problem of the orginal BSD
license which is described at <A
href="http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html">http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/bsd.html</A> </DIV>
<DIV>They can fix it by deleting the clauses 3 and 6.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Fernando Velloso.</DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>