[License-discuss] Proposal of new new open-source license for graphics (TERO-GL-1.0)
McCoy Smith
mccoy at lexpan.law
Mon Nov 3 23:26:08 UTC 2025
On 11/3/2025 2:35 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
> On 11/3/25 1:01 AM, Morten Fruelund wrote:
>> The license text does not contain any restrictions with regard to
>> fields of endeavor, and it does not distinguish between virtual and
>> physical use or the purpose of the use. In order to achieve the goal,
>> you mention, we simply opted to only grant a copyright license to the
>> licensed material, and not include, e.g., a patent license like many
>> other open-source licenses also do not do.
>
> That's an interesting approach, a big hedging on the spirit of OSS,
> but allowable (in my individual opinion) as long as you don't
> explicitly deny patent rights. When you have updated your text from
> other commentary, go ahead and submit it to license-review and we'll
> delve into the actual text.
The text of this license *does* explicitly deny patent rights though,
including implied patent license rights. So I think for that reason
alone this one violates OSD 1 & 7.
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list