[License-discuss] Open Source license question

[David Woolley]

On 07/04/2024 04:37, Justin Clift wrote:
>      -   Unless provided with a written agreement, no persons are 
> permitted to redistribute another paid version of CapRover.

"paid version" needs defining.  Any requirement that all distribution be 
free of charge would be invalid. Furthermore, any restriction on a 
commercial fork goes against the fundamental spirit of the Apache 
licence, as that is one of its key differences from the GPL.

>     -   Furthermore, any modifications of free features of CapRover
> should be distributed as free & opensource software.

Again violates the spirit of the Apache licence, and lacks definitions.