[License-discuss] OSI definition
Russell Nelson
nelson at crynwr.com
Mon Jan 25 19:54:44 UTC 2021
Feel free!
On 1/25/21 10:55 AM, Antoine Thomas via License-discuss wrote:
> Russel, I think that you should put this quotation in a Frame:
>
> "The whole point behind Open Source is the same point behind Free
> Software -- to transfer the power to discriminate between users to the
> users themselves. It's the users who decide whether they want to use the
> software or not. Open Source creates a free market in software. If you
> don't want your software to be free for anyone to use, then you aren't
> distributing Free Software as a concept, and aren't distributing Open
> Source as a brand."
>
> it is so powerful, it explains everything in a paragraph. May I ask
> the right to use it on my blog?
>
>
> PrestaShop
> <https://www.prestashop.com/?utm_source=signature&utm_medium=e-mail&utm_campaign=emails-signatures>
>
>
> Antoine Thomas aka ttoine
>
> Open Source Evangelist
>
> t: +33 (0)6 63 13 79 06
>
> antoine.thomas at prestashop.com <mailto:antoine.thomas at prestashop.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2021 at 16:36, Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com
> <mailto:nelson at crynwr.com>> wrote:
>
> On 1/24/21 12:22 PM, Mat K. Witts wrote:
> > On 22/01/2021 00:29, McCoy Smith wrote:
> >> A corporation is a group of natural persons.
> > Not on it's own,
>
> Yes, on its own. It's a group. You intend to discriminate, we
> intend for
> you to not discriminate. Stop. End of sentence. EOT. Ctrl-D. ^D.
> You're
> done. Your ship has sunk, your bird has flown, your toast has popped,
> your souffle has fallen. Your license is not compatible with the Open
> Source Definition BY DESIGN. There's really no possible
> interpretation
> whereby your discrimination becomes one we would allow.
>
> We don't WANT to discriminate, even against "bad" people.
>
> You DO want to discriminate.
>
> There is no meeting of the minds.
>
> The whole point behind Open Source is the same point behind Free
> Software -- to transfer the power to discriminate between users to
> the
> users themselves. It's the users who decide whether they want to
> use the
> software or not. Open Source creates a free market in software. If
> you
> don't want your software to be free for anyone to use, then you
> aren't
> distributing Free Software as a concept, and aren't distributing Open
> Source as a brand.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and
> not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official
> statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an
> opensource.org <http://opensource.org> email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> <mailto:License-discuss at lists.opensource.org>
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> The opinions expressed in this email are those of the sender and not necessarily those of the Open Source Initiative. Official statements by the Open Source Initiative will be sent from an opensource.org email address.
>
> License-discuss mailing list
> License-discuss at lists.opensource.org
> http://lists.opensource.org/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20210125/88afd75f/attachment.html>
More information about the License-discuss
mailing list