[License-discuss] How can we as a community help empower authors outside license agreements?

[Russell Nelson]

On 3/17/20 6:14 PM, Tobie Langel wrote:
> If OSI is to be the custodian of open source, it needs to be 
> representative of the open source community at large. Not based on a 
> winner takes model, which is, by definition, not representative.

Sure, but Ethical Software isn't Open Source. That's what we keep 
telling you. If you want to prevent "unethical" entities from using your 
software, you are separating yourself from the Open Source community.

I want to emphasize that there is nothing wrong with wanting to insist 
on ethical use of your software. *Nothing* wrong with that. But it's not 
Open Source.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200318/42d2baed/attachment.html>