[License-discuss] How can we as a community help empower authors outside license agreements?

[Russell Nelson]

On 3/15/20 8:19 PM, Coraline Ada Ehmke wrote:
>
>> On Mar 15, 2020, at 7:07 PM, Russell Nelson <nelson at crynwr.com 
>> <mailto:nelson at crynwr.com>> wrote:
>>
>> Ethical software is by definition not open source.
>
> Can you point to any specific points in the definition of Ethical Open 
> Source that conflicts with the OSD? (I’m not talking about ELOS.)
>
> https://ethicalsource.dev/definition/


No. I've already done that and you didn't reply. Why should I repeat 
myself with zero expectation of a substantive reply? EVERY point except 
#6 conflicts with the OSD. The intention of the Ethical Software 
Definition conflicts with the Open Source Definition. Open Source allows 
all use by a copyright. Ethical Software denies some uses by social shaming.

And don't you DARE call it "Ethical Open Source"! It's either Open 
Source OR it's "Ethical" (by your definition, on case by case or time 
after time).


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-discuss_lists.opensource.org/attachments/20200316/c5251932/attachment.html>