[License-discuss] How can we as a community help empower authors outside license agreements?

[Thorsten Glaser]

Coraline Ada Ehmke dixit:

>Can you point to any specific points in the definition of Ethical Open
>Source that conflicts with the OSD? (I’m not talking about ELOS.)

#2 (OSD#6 and OSD#10 probably, and Debian’s desert island test)
which is an undue burden anyway

#3 (doesn’t belong into a licence; “just” is subjective; requires
a “community” which fails for the same reasons as #2 does) and
perhaps OSD#4

#4, #5, #6 (also OSD#5, OSD#6, OSD#10, and undue restrictions on
both creators and users)

#7 (a request is fine but it may not be part of a licence) is
worded in a way that may be interpreted as conflicting with OSD#1

bye,
//mirabilos
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.		-- Coywolf Qi Hunt